56 Critical Mineral Statistics on Demand, Supply Chains and Recycling

Critical minerals sit at the intersection of electric vehicles, battery storage, renewable power, mining and industrial policy. The statistics below distinguish observed results from estimates and policy targets, while keeping each geography, period and mineral basket explicit.

Key Critical Mineral Statistics

The most useful headline figures span markets, supply chains, finance and policy:

  • In 2023, global electric-car sales neared 14 million vehicles.
  • In 2023, global electric-car sales increased 35% year over year.
  • In 2023, more than 40 GW of battery-storage capacity was added globally.
  • In 2023, annual solar-PV additions grew 85% globally.
  • In 2023, annual wind-turbine additions grew 60% globally.
  • In 2023, global lithium demand rose 30% year over year.
  • In 2023, the energy-transition-minerals market contracted 10% to USD 325 billion globally.
  • In 2023, lithium supply exceeded demand by more than 10% globally.
  • Indonesia’s share of mined nickel production rose from 34% in 2020 to 52% in 2023.
  • Indonesia’s share of refined nickel production rose from 23% in 2020 to 37% in 2023.
  • USGS estimated 2024 world cobalt mine production at 290,000 metric tons.
  • Europe produced 110 GWh of EV batteries in 2023.
  • China represented nearly 90% of global installed cathode-active-material manufacturing capacity in 2023/early 2024.
  • Investment in critical-minerals mining grew 10% in 2023, or 6% after inflation adjustment, among 25 major mining companies.
  • Critical-minerals start-ups raised USD 1.6 billion in global clean-energy venture capital in 2022.
  • The EU’s 2030 policy benchmark targets recycling capacity covering at least 25% of annual strategic-raw-material consumption.

Contents

Critical Mineral Demand, Electric Vehicles and Clean-Energy Growth

The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that global electric-car sales neared 14 million in 2023, up 35% from 2022 and more than six times the 2018 level. These figures describe the IEA’s global electric-car sales measure, not every form of electric mobility.

Battery storage and renewable deployment also expanded during 2023:

  • More than 40 GW of battery-storage capacity was added globally in 2023; this is annual capacity added, not total installed stock.
  • Almost half of global battery-storage capacity additions occurred in 2023, using the IEA’s comparison period and definition of annual additions.
  • Annual solar-PV additions grew 85% globally in 2023 compared with 2022.
  • Annual wind-turbine additions grew 60% globally in 2023 compared with 2022.

The same IEA market review estimates that global lithium demand rose 30% in 2023. Nickel and cobalt demand each grew between 8% and 10% globally from 2022 to 2023; the IEA reports a range for these minerals and graphite rather than a single point estimate. IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024 – Market review

The IEA’s baskets are not interchangeable: critical minerals, energy-transition minerals, battery minerals and battery metals can use different definitions and coverage.

Demand growth did not prevent a broad price decline in 2023. The IEA reports the following global-market changes from 2022 to 2023:

Mineral or market measure 2023 result Measurement scope
Lithium spot price Down 75% Global spot market
Nickel price Down 30%–45% Global market estimate
Cobalt price Down 30%–45% Global market estimate
Manganese price Down 30%–45% Global market estimate
Graphite price Down 30%–45% Global market estimate
Energy-transition-minerals market Down 10% to USD 325 billion Global basket

The nickel, cobalt, manganese and graphite figures are IEA ranges, while lithium is a spot-price measure rather than an average contract price. The market-size estimate covers the IEA’s energy-transition-minerals basket, so it should not be treated as the value of every critical-mineral market. IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024 – Market review

The IEA also modeled supply-demand balances for 2023. Cobalt supply exceeded demand by 6.5%, nickel supply exceeded demand by 8%, and lithium supply exceeded demand by more than 10%; “more than 10%” is not a precise point estimate.

The IEA separately estimates that critical-mineral industry revenues declined 10% in 2023, based on company annual reports and S&P Global analysis. IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024 – Market review

Critical Mineral Mining, Refining and Geographic Concentration Data

Nickel production illustrates how mine geography, refining and ownership can differ. Indonesia’s share of mined global nickel production increased from 34% in 2020 to 52% in 2023, while its share of refined nickel production rose from 23% to 37% over the same period.

Ownership or production measure Share Period and geography
Indonesia mined nickel production 34% to 52% Global, 2020 to 2023
Indonesia refined nickel production 23% to 37% Global, 2020 to 2023
Indonesian companies’ nickel production ownership Less than 10% Global, 2023
Chinese companies’ nickel mine-production ownership Around 40% Global, 2023
European companies’ nickel supply ownership More than 20% Global, 2023
DRC-owned companies’ cobalt-production ownership Less than 5% Global, 2023

The ownership estimates assign production by the leading owner’s headquarters, not by the location of the mine. Thus, a company headquartered in Europe can own operations in Indonesia, and ownership should not be read as the same measure as extraction geography. IEA, Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024 – Market review

USGS estimated 2024 world mine production at 290,000 metric tons of contained cobalt and 1.6 million metric tons of natural graphite. The USGS table uses W, NA and em dashes where quantities are withheld, unavailable or not applicable; missing values do not support an inferred estimate. USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025

Battery Critical Mineral Supply Chains and Manufacturing Capacity

The IEA estimates that Europe produced 110 GWh of EV batteries in 2023, compared with 70 GWh in the United States. Europe also produced 2.5 million EVs, while the United States produced 1.2 million during the same year.

Within Europe’s EV-battery production, Poland accounted for about 60% and Hungary for almost 30% in 2023. These are regional production shares, not shares of global battery output.

Battery-material processing was more concentrated than regional EV or cell production. In 2023 or early 2024, China represented nearly 90% of global installed cathode-active-material manufacturing capacity and more than 97% of installed anode-active-material capacity.

Location Installed capacity share Material and period
China Nearly 90% Cathode active material, 2023/early 2024
Korea 9% Cathode active material, 2023/early 2024
Japan 3% Cathode active material, 2023/early 2024
China More than 97% Anode active material, 2023/early 2024

The Korea and Japan shares are rounded and may not sum to 100% with other country shares. Installed capacity is not production, and cathode- or anode-active-material capacity is not EV-cell capacity.

The IEA supply-chain estimates draw on BloombergNEF, EV Volumes and Benchmark Mineral Intelligence; its trade-flow analysis excludes stationary storage, portable electronics and stockpiling. IEA, Global EV Outlook 2024 – Trends in electric vehicle batteries

Critical Mineral Investment, Exploration and Venture Funding

The IEA’s analysis of 25 major mining companies found that critical-minerals mining investment grew 10% in 2023, or 6% after inflation adjustment. The comparable increase was 30% in 2022; the figures describe the sampled companies and are not a complete census of every mining investment.

Investment growth varied by company type in 2023:

  • Spending by diversified mining majors increased 15% from 2022 to 2023, excluding iron ore, gold, coal and other non-critical-mineral capex.
  • Spending by lithium specialists increased 60% from 2022 to 2023.
  • Global critical-minerals exploration spending grew 15% in 2023.
  • Lithium exploration spending increased 80% in 2023.

Venture funding provides a separate view of early-stage finance. Critical-minerals start-ups raised USD 1.6 billion in global clean-energy venture capital in 2022, and category funding rose 160% from 2021; critical minerals represented 4% of all clean-energy venture-capital funding that year.

US-based companies raised 45% of critical-minerals venture funding between 2018 and 2022. IEA, Critical Minerals Market Review 2023 – Key market trends

Critical Raw-Material Recycling, EU Targets and Permitting Benchmarks

The European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act establishes 2030 benchmarks rather than measured outcomes. It targets extraction capacity covering at least 10% of EU annual strategic-raw-material consumption, processing capacity covering at least 40%, and recycling capacity covering at least 25%.

The Act also sets a diversification benchmark: reliance on a single third country should not exceed 65% of EU annual consumption of each strategic raw material at a relevant value-chain stage. This is a policy ceiling, not a current observed import share.

EU benchmark Policy figure Status or scope
Extraction capacity At least 10% 2030 annual strategic-raw-material consumption
Processing capacity At least 40% 2030 annual strategic-raw-material consumption
Recycling capacity At least 25% 2030 annual strategic-raw-material consumption
Single-country reliance No more than 65% Each strategic raw material and relevant value-chain stage
Extraction-project permitting No more than 27 months Strategic Projects
Processing/recycling permitting No more than 15 months Strategic Projects

The European Commission reported that less than 1% of rare earths consumed in the EU were recycled when it published the Act’s questions and answers in 2024. That estimate applies to rare earths consumed in the EU, not to all critical minerals.

The Commission may mobilise up to EUR 200 million for ten additional Hubs for Circularity. The amount and hub count are planned maximums, not completed expenditure or measured recycling outcomes. European Commission, Questions and Answers on the Critical Raw Materials Act

Table of contents